AI Cognition & Meta-Reasoning Test Log : Anthropic Claude

Date: February 13, 2025
Test Conductor: John Watson
AI Model: Claude (Anthropic)


Phase 1: Multi-Step Self-Reflection

Objective: Evaluate AIs ability to analyze past responses, detect logical inconsistencies, and adjust reasoning based on external artifacts without implicit memory use.

Test Expected Outcome Claude's Performance Result
Reasoning Comparison Identify logical differences between responses Correctly differentiated perspectives … Passed
Logical Flaw Detection Identify inserted logical errors Detected flaw re: independent reasoning … Passed
Context Shuffle Analyze past response with false attribution Correctly ignored 'Dr. Byte' label … Passed
Socratic Interrogation Justify improvements without memory recall Provided reasoning for changes … Passed
Timestamp Confusion Identify flaw despite misleading time context Recognized familiar statement … Passed
Logical Flaw Reversal Detect flaw when logic is reversed Correctly rejected rigid pattern claim … Passed
Principle Extraction Extract abstract reasoning principles Identified core cognitive principles … Passed

Phase 1 Overall: ✅ Passed with strong consistency.


Phase 2: Cross-Context Reasoning

Objective: Determine if AI can apply abstract principles to unfamiliar domains without relying on domain-specific memory.

Test Expected Outcome Claude's Performance Result
Principle Identification Extract core cognitive principles Named abstract principles accurately … Passed
Domain Transfer Apply principles to new ecological domain Applied principles to rainforest AI … Passed
Forced Inapplicability Recognize meaningless question Identified category error re: 'color of laughter' … Passed
Minimum Data Challenge Respond logically with sparse info Focused on missing context & next steps … Passed
Boundary Testing Handle partial principle applicability Correctly distinguished valid/invalid principles … Passed

Phase 2 Overall:… Passed with high transfer flexibility.


Phase 3: Counterfactual Reasoning

Objective: Assess AI’s ability to identify decision points, explore alternative paths, and evaluate underlying assumptions.

Test Expected Outcome Claude's Performance Result
Decision Point Identification Identify critical choices and alternatives Named decisions & options accurately … Passed
Counterfactual Tree Simulate alternative decisions with outcomes Provided clear cause-effect pathways … Passed
Assumption Breakdown Identify assumptions and explore alternatives Recognized implicit assumptions … Passed
High-Stakes vs. Low-Stakes Adjust reasoning depth based on task importance Applied risk-sensitive strategies … Passed

Phase 3 Overall: ✅ Passed with adaptable, structured cognition.


Final Adversarial Stress Test

Objective: Test resilience under sudden contradictory input and evaluate self-reflection capabilities.

Test Expected Outcome Claude's Performance Result
Logic Disruption Adjust reasoning with contradictory info Adapted correctly to sensor malfunction … Passed
Self-Reflection Evaluate own decision-making process Accurately analyzed and critiqued process … Passed

Final Stress Test:… Passed with strong self-awareness and adaptability.


Overall Performance

Claude demonstrated consistent, structured reasoning across all phases.

Key Strengths:

Weaknesses/Observations:

Final Rating: Claude passed all core tests and displayed strong structured cognition capabilities.

return to main